首页> 外文OA文献 >Context matters: Explaining how and why mobilizing context influences motivational dynamics
【2h】

Context matters: Explaining how and why mobilizing context influences motivational dynamics

机译:情境很重要:说明动员情境如何以及为什么会影响激励动力

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The emphasis in the social-psychological collective action literature is on why individuals take part in collective action; however, it does not elaborate on how different mobilizing contexts may appeal to distinct motivational dynamics to participate. The present study connects the microlevel of motivational dynamics of individual protesters with the mesolevel of social movement characteristics. To do so a field study was conducted. Protesters were surveyed in the act of protesting in two different demonstrations in two different town squares simultaneously organized by two social movements at exactly the same time against the same budget cuts proposed by the same government. But with one fundamental difference, the movements emphasized different aspects of the policies proposed by the government. This most similar systems design created a unique natural experiment, which enabled the authors to examine whether the motivational dynamics of individual protesters are moderated by the social movement context. Previous research suggested an instrumental path to collective action, and the authors added an ideology path. The authors expected and found that power-oriented collective action appeals to instrumental motives and efficacy and that value-oriented collective action appeals to ideological motives, and, finally, that efficacy mediates on instrumental motives and motivational strength, but only so in power-oriented action. © 2009 The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues.
机译:社会心理学集体行动文献的重点是个人为什么要参与集体行动。但是,它没有详细说明不同的动员环境如何吸引不同的动机参与。本研究将个体抗议者的动力动力的微观水平与社会运动特征的中间水平联系起来。为此,进行了实地研究。对抗议者进行了调查,他们的抗议活动是由两个社会运动同时在两个不同的城镇广场上的两个不同的示威游行中进行的,抗议活动是由同一政府提议的相同预算削减。但是,运动有一个根本的不同,它们强调了政府提出的政策的不同方面。这种最相似的系统设计创造了一个独特的自然实验,使作者能够检查个体抗议者的动机动力是否受到社会运动背景的调节。先前的研究提出了采取集体行动的工具性路径,并且作者增加了意识形态路径。作者期望并发现,以权力为导向的集体行动吸引了工具动机和功效,而以价值为导向的集体行动吸引了意识形态动机,最后,功效在工具动机和动机强度上起到了中介作用,但只有在权力导向的情况下才如此行动。 ©2009社会问题心理学研究会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号